By Maggie Foggin, co-founder of Frostbox at Social Times:
Unless you are a bus driver or a professional tightrope walker, checking Facebook at work may actually be productive.
This post may just be used against me pretty soon, but at Frostbox we actively encourage social interactions and (within reason) accept that people are not robots and cannot be banned from their online lives for seven hours a day.
Being a company where the business model is based on having an active social media life, we encourage all our staff members to actively use platforms like Facebook and Twitter.
We do realize there are potentially irreversible consequences: company plans and office memos could go public when an overeager employee finds them funny and wants to share them with a friend who, not having any loyalty to the company, sends them further.
However, the positive side effects of social media awareness are much greater than the risk that someone will be able to see that we have a coffee machine in the office, brewing hot liquid, which violates health and safety codes. (To clarify: adequate training has been given and now every member of the team is capable of making mean cappuccinos.)
Have you ever tried to stop your kids from doing something? How did that work out? There is a high probability they came back home with that blue hair or piercing after all, but if not, they now scratched you from a list of cool parents that can relate to their lives. Well done. Orwell would be proud.
A similar thing happens when you introduce draconian rules in the office: a repressed worker is an inefficient worker. They concentrate more on their mobile pop-up messages than on your spreadsheets (unless you banned the mobiles, too?).
There are countless applications that translate Facebook updates into Excel or text, so whenever you glimpse over their shoulders, they all look really busy. Banning social media will simply encourage them to find other sources of entertainment.
Over the years we have seen the benefits of having team members who are active on social media platforms versus those who are not really interested in them.
Not surprisingly, the ones glued to their social feeds turned out to be much better not only at marketing the brand, since they understand when and what catches interest and what will look like an overload of spam or even worse: nothing at all (hello, Apple marketing team). They absorb knowledge faster, innovate quickly, share knowledge; and engage with peers, business partners and customers better.
The Academy of Management Study found that employees who were allowed to use Facebook were more productive than co-workers who were not.
Harvard Business Review agrees, that “[these] technologies have taken on a life of their own, creating unexpected benefits in surprising places […] by integrating social platforms into the core and achieving scale, companies can fulfill the potential of social technologies. The result will be improvements in the ‘informal’ aspects of the organization – the person-to-person connections through which work actually gets done. The improvements in collaboration, communication, and connection will contribute to helping the organization meet its goals.”
There will always be the argument that social networks are just unnecessary noise. However, we cannot blame them for people being mentally absent from work. Before Facebooks and Twitters, we had phones, IM, email, etc. We all have to learn how to use those tools in a productive way.
Read the full article here
Unless you are a bus driver or a professional tightrope walker, checking Facebook at work may actually be productive.
This post may just be used against me pretty soon, but at Frostbox we actively encourage social interactions and (within reason) accept that people are not robots and cannot be banned from their online lives for seven hours a day.
Being a company where the business model is based on having an active social media life, we encourage all our staff members to actively use platforms like Facebook and Twitter.
We do realize there are potentially irreversible consequences: company plans and office memos could go public when an overeager employee finds them funny and wants to share them with a friend who, not having any loyalty to the company, sends them further.
However, the positive side effects of social media awareness are much greater than the risk that someone will be able to see that we have a coffee machine in the office, brewing hot liquid, which violates health and safety codes. (To clarify: adequate training has been given and now every member of the team is capable of making mean cappuccinos.)
Have you ever tried to stop your kids from doing something? How did that work out? There is a high probability they came back home with that blue hair or piercing after all, but if not, they now scratched you from a list of cool parents that can relate to their lives. Well done. Orwell would be proud.
A similar thing happens when you introduce draconian rules in the office: a repressed worker is an inefficient worker. They concentrate more on their mobile pop-up messages than on your spreadsheets (unless you banned the mobiles, too?).
There are countless applications that translate Facebook updates into Excel or text, so whenever you glimpse over their shoulders, they all look really busy. Banning social media will simply encourage them to find other sources of entertainment.
Over the years we have seen the benefits of having team members who are active on social media platforms versus those who are not really interested in them.
Not surprisingly, the ones glued to their social feeds turned out to be much better not only at marketing the brand, since they understand when and what catches interest and what will look like an overload of spam or even worse: nothing at all (hello, Apple marketing team). They absorb knowledge faster, innovate quickly, share knowledge; and engage with peers, business partners and customers better.
The Academy of Management Study found that employees who were allowed to use Facebook were more productive than co-workers who were not.
Harvard Business Review agrees, that “[these] technologies have taken on a life of their own, creating unexpected benefits in surprising places […] by integrating social platforms into the core and achieving scale, companies can fulfill the potential of social technologies. The result will be improvements in the ‘informal’ aspects of the organization – the person-to-person connections through which work actually gets done. The improvements in collaboration, communication, and connection will contribute to helping the organization meet its goals.”
There will always be the argument that social networks are just unnecessary noise. However, we cannot blame them for people being mentally absent from work. Before Facebooks and Twitters, we had phones, IM, email, etc. We all have to learn how to use those tools in a productive way.
Read the full article here
0 comments:
Post a Comment